Saturday, 31 October 2015

Theory as Practise - 30/10/2015

Recap - 

In todays seminar class, we discussed everything we need to know ready for the first summative assessment next week! We now have two weeks off but we need to be able to show we have this blog ready, in these next two weeks I want to try a minimum of the two design games that we got to try and I want to aim to try and create my own... 

Sorry it's a short post today guys! 

Saturday, 24 October 2015

Theory as Practise - 23/10/2015

A Personal Manifesto- 

This week we created our own personal manifesto, we looked at from the first things first manifesto, we had to read through it and create notes from the lesson, the original manifesto looks like this; 

" A Design Manifesto We, the undersigned, are graphic designers, art directors and visual communicators who have been raised in a world in which the techniques and apparatus of advertising have persistently been presented to us as the most lucrative, effective and desirable use of our talents. Many design teachers and mentors promote this belief; the market rewards it; a tide of books and publications reinforces it. 

Encouraged in this direction, designers then apply their skill and imagination to sell dog biscuits, designer coffee, diamonds, detergents, hair gel, cigarettes, credit cards, sneakers, butt toners, light beer and heavy-duty recreational vehicles. Commercial work has always paid the bills, but many graphic designers have now let it become, in large measure, what graphic designers do. This, in turn, is how the world perceives design. The profession’s time and energy is used up manufacturing demand for things that are inessential at best. 

Many of us have grown increasingly uncomfortable with this view of design. Designers who devote their efforts primarily to advertising, marketing and brand development are supporting, and implicitly endorsing, a mental environment so saturated with commercial messages that it is changing the very way citizen consumers speak, think, feel, respond and interact. To some extent we are all helping draft a reductive and immeasurably harmful code of public discourse. 

There are pursuits more worthy of our problem solving skills. Unprecedented environmental, social and cultural crises demand our attention. Many cultural interventions, social marketing campaigns, books, magazines, exhibitions, educational tools, television programs, films, charitable causes and other information design projects urgently require our expertise and help. 

We propose a reversal of priorities in favor of more useful, lasting and democratic forms of communication - a mindshift away from product marketing and toward the exploration and production of a new kind of meaning. The scope of debate is shrinking; it must expand. Consumerism is running uncontested; it must be challenged by other perspectives expressed, in part, through the visual languages and resources of design. 

In 1964, 22 visual communicators signed the original call for our skills to be put to worthwhile use. With the explosive growth of global commercial culture, their message has only grown more urgent. Today, we renew their manifesto in expectation that no more decades will pass before it is taken to heart. 

signed: Student Name ... 

Jonathan Barnbrook Nick Bell Andrew Blauvelt Hans Bockting Irma Boom Sheila Levrant de Bretteville Max Bruinsma Sian Cook Linda van Deursen Chris Dixon William Drenttel Gert Dumbar Simon Esterson Vince Frost Ken Garland Milton Glaser Jessica Helfand Steven Heller Andrew Howard Tibor Kalman Jeffery Keedy Zuzana Licko Ellen Lupton Katherine McCoy Armand Mevis J. Abbott Miller Rick Poynor Lucienne Roberts Erik Spiekermann Jan van Toorn Teal Triggs Rudy VanderLans Bob Wilkinson 

and many more " 

The large black area is where the manifesto named many students that worked on it, so I highlighted their names out like Rob did in the class what we discussed was that the manifesto shows fighting consumerism as creative minds are for the good, packaging is not useless and is actually used to express the mind, there is a fear of change, commercial work needs to balance with messages and that commercial work could be used to fund other activities. 

We then went on to create our own manifesto by getting rid of half of the script by crossing out, I came up with two; 

The first one; 

" A Design Manifesto We, the undersigned, are graphic designers, art directors and visual communicators who have been raised in a world in which the techniques and apparatus of advertising have persistently been presented to us as the most lucrative, effective and desirable use of our talents. Many design teachers and mentors promote this belief; the market rewards it; a tide of books and publications reinforces it. 

Encouraged in this direction, designers then apply their skill and imagination to sell dog biscuits, designer coffee, diamonds, detergents, hair gel, cigarettes, credit cards, sneakers, butt toners, light beer and heavy-duty recreational vehicles. Commercial work has always paid the bills, but many graphic designers have now let it become, in large measure, what graphic designers do. This, in turn, is how the world perceives design. The profession’s time and energy is used up manufacturing demand for things that are inessential at best. 

Many of us have grown increasingly uncomfortable with this view of design. Designers who devote their efforts primarily to advertising, marketing and brand development are supporting, and implicitly endorsing, a mental environment so saturated with commercial messages that it is changing the very way citizen consumers speak, think, feel, respond and interact. To some extent we are all helping draft a reductive and immeasurably harmful code of public discourse. 

There are pursuits more worthy of our problem solving skills. Unprecedented environmental, social and cultural crises demand our attention. Many cultural interventions, social marketing campaigns, books, magazines, exhibitions, educational tools, television programs, films, charitable causes and other information design projects urgently require our expertise and help. 

We propose a reversal of priorities in favor of more useful, lasting and democratic forms of communication - a mindshift away from product marketing and toward the exploration and production of a new kind of meaning. The scope of debate is shrinking; it must expand. Consumerism is running uncontested; it must be challenged by other perspectives expressed, in part, through the visual languages and resources of design. 

In 1964, 22 visual communicators signed the original call for our skills to be put to worthwhile use. With the explosive growth of global commercial culture, their message has only grown more urgent. Today, we renew their manifesto in expectation that no more decades will pass before it is taken to heart. 

signed: Student Name ... 

Jonathan Barnbrook Nick Bell Andrew Blauvelt Hans Bockting Irma Boom Sheila Levrant de Bretteville Max Bruinsma Sian Cook Linda van Deursen Chris Dixon William Drenttel Gert Dumbar Simon Esterson Vince Frost Ken Garland Milton Glaser Jessica Helfand Steven Heller Andrew Howard Tibor Kalman Jeffery Keedy Zuzana Licko Ellen Lupton Katherine McCoy Armand Mevis J. Abbott Miller Rick Poynor Lucienne Roberts Erik Spiekermann Jan van Toorn Teal Triggs Rudy VanderLans Bob Wilkinson 

and many more " 

So in the first one I decided to leave the word 'signed' visible and signed it myself, as I was struggling to understand the manifesto I then got a new sheet of paper and crossed out these words to show ; 

" A Design Manifesto We, the undersigned, are graphic designers, art directors and visual communicators who have been raised in a world in which the techniques and apparatus of advertising have persistently been presented to us as the most lucrative, effective and desirable use of our talents. Many design teachers and mentors promote this belief; the market rewards it; a tide of books and publications reinforces it. 

Encouraged in this direction, designers then apply their skill and imagination to sell dog biscuits, designer coffee, diamonds, detergents, hair gel, cigarettes, credit cards, sneakers, butt toners, light beer and heavy-duty recreational vehicles. Commercial work has always paid the bills, but many graphic designers have now let it become, in large measure, what graphic designers do. This, in turn, is how the world perceives design. The profession’s time and energy is used up manufacturing demand for things that are inessential at best. 

Many of us have grown increasingly uncomfortable with this view of design. Designers who devote their efforts primarily to advertising, marketing and brand development are supporting, and implicitly endorsing, a mental environment so saturated with commercial messages that it is changing the very way citizen consumers speak, think, feel, respond and interact. To some extent we are all helping draft a reductive and immeasurably harmful code of public discourse. 

There are pursuits more worthy of our problem solving skills. Unprecedented environmental, social and cultural crises demand our attention. Many cultural interventions, social marketing campaigns, books, magazines, exhibitions, educational tools, television programs, films, charitable causes and other information design projects urgently require our expertise and help. 

We propose a reversal of priorities in favor of more useful, lasting and democratic forms of communication - a mindshift away from product marketing and toward the exploration and production of a new kind of meaning. The scope of debate is shrinking; it must expand. Consumerism is running uncontested; it must be challenged by other perspectives expressed, in part, through the visual languages and resources of design. 

In 1964, 22 visual communicators signed the original call for our skills to be put to worthwhile use. With the explosive growth of global commercial culture, their message has only grown more urgent. Today, we renew their manifesto in expectation that no more decades will pass before it is taken to heart. 

signed: Student Name ... 

Jonathan Barnbrook Nick Bell Andrew Blauvelt Hans Bockting Irma Boom Sheila Levrant de Bretteville Max Bruinsma Sian Cook Linda van Deursen Chris Dixon William Drenttel Gert Dumbar Simon Esterson Vince Frost Ken Garland Milton Glaser Jessica Helfand Steven Heller Andrew Howard Tibor Kalman Jeffery Keedy Zuzana Licko Ellen Lupton Katherine McCoy Armand Mevis J. Abbott Miller Rick Poynor Lucienne Roberts Erik Spiekermann Jan van Toorn Teal Triggs Rudy VanderLans Bob Wilkinson 

and many more " 

' We the graphic designers devote our heart. ' 

This is something I completely agree with as I know I put my everything into my work... 

Saturday, 17 October 2015

Theory as Practise - 16/10/2015

Design Games - 

In this week's class we was told to look into Design Games, we were given two objectives for the class I was in an all girl group and we all sat together and put our heads together the first objective we chose was this one; 



I. Perfect Circle
  • *  play with four players
  • *  each player has coloured pen:
    red, green, blue or black.
  • *  players take clockwise turns lasting
    30 secs.
  • *  use a timer.
  1. 1,  First turn:
    Draw a filled-in circle in the centre of the paper.

  2. 2,  Following turns:
    Improve the circle’s round shape by enlarging its borders.

  3. 3,  Stop when the circle is perfect.
Maurer, L., Paulus, E., Puckey, J., Wouters, R. (2013). Conditional design workbook. Amsterdam: Valiz. 

I then stated to the group I remember being taught in philosophy that you can never draw a perfect circle it is physically impossible, it will never be achieved. So, in the middle of the page we wrote out the equation to a perfect circle. 




Rob said we was very creative however try again, so we did and halfway through I realised that we was drawing circles after circles around each other we should of been adding on to it, so I started colouring in on top of others circles where the circle may have not been rounded. 



These below pictures are what the rest of the class created, one group decided to draw a bridge as they also knew a circle is impossible to be perfect; 













The original design was shown like this which not many of us actually got and the equation was NOT in the book! 






We then created the second objective which was the beach objective; 


IV. The Beach
  • *  play with four players
  • *  each player has coloured pen:
    red, green, blue or black.
  • *  players take clockwise turns
  1. 1,  First turn: Place a dot.
  2. 2,  Following turns:
    Place a dot in the centre of the largest empty space on the paper.

  3. 3,  Stop drawing when you think the beach is crowded.
This workshop was inspired by the concept of Charles Leadbeater, as expressed in his essay ‘The Beach Ethic’. “Beaches are ordered without being controlled. No one is in charge. [...] Underlying the beaches appeal is a simple idea: the beach is a commons where people can self-organise and play [...] There are no zoning regulations, fences, nor white lines to tell you where to go.”
Maurer, L., Paulus, E., Puckey, J., Wouters, R. (2013). Conditional design workbook. Amsterdam: Valiz. 

We did dots all around the page and took turns with this our work ended up looking like this (see below) everybody else's work is all below this image. You had to be able to create a beach and make it look busy, in the end we decided it would get full quicker, so we designated Emma as the 'Chief Dabber' she took all five sharpies and dotted them all over the page to make it look busier and then we decided to graffiti things that remind us of the beach on the page, me and Katy drew an umberella.



These were the rest that the class drew, one group drew large circles to explain large families arriving on the beach and one group drew all the dots connected to represent people walking around the beach and the paths created;











The original design was shown like this which many groups portrayed well- 





I really enjoyed this class today and I'm wanting to try some of the other games in the book.

Saturday, 10 October 2015

Theory as Practise - 09/10/2015

Eco Theory as Practise- 

Okay, I'm not going to lie, this is difficult to get my head around... so i'll tell you all the notes I made. 

We started by being set the task off reading this Theory as Practise manifesto (see below) now I struggled to understand this piece, we had to write under 125 words, our understanding of it. 














I wrote: "In the poetics of the open work I feel that it is telling a designer throughout their creative process to never forget there are going to be problems or flaws that will happen and that you need to keep positive on the work you are creating. Work can be understand in more than one sense so if your wishing your work to symbolise one aspect, you need to work hard to make that thought stay in the consumers mind and not thinking of other roots to your process. " 

What I took away from the class was these main words; Consumerism, Symbolism, Culture, Historical, Political, Economic, Interpretation, Subjective, Perception, Frames, Performer, Experience, Chants, Interaction and Conductor.

These words I feel I need to look out for an understand from every manifesto. We then got a group chat on our Unilearn page and we discussed what we thought about the manifesto, the group put all these on to the chat between group C;


‘The Poetics of Open Works’ - Umberto Eco

A - Read the essay, and discuss, in an ad-hoc reading group.
B - Write a paragraph of text which provides a succinct overview of Eco’s theory in no more than 125 words (do not quote).
C - Paste your text at the head of this shared writing space, identifying its authors (members of the reading group).

Open discussions within this writing space, to further explore the following questions and your individual thoughts and positions.

Q1 - What are your thoughts about the open work?
Q2 - In what way do you think that open works are poetic?
Q3 - How would you contextualise the open work to your practice?

Work together in order to produce a rich set of ideas and positions.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

// C1
Keywords: movement, trends, negative space, instructions, performer, multiplicity, freedom, subjectivity, incompleteness, perception, time & change, possibilities, cultural, understanding, theories, invitation
// C2
Keywords: viewpoint, position, frames, reading, multiplicity, performer, improvisation, univocal, subjective, culture, message, chance, interaction, flaws, symbolise, conductor, consumer, direction, challenge


  • Interpretation
  • Freedom  yes
  • How something is perceived
  • Cultural opinions/changes
  • Social opinions/changes
  • Indefinite meanings
  • Symbolism
  • Expression
  • Experience

  • Interpretation
  • Initiave
  • Layers
  • Subjective
  • Response

The Poetics of Open Work

Open work is a term used for a creative piece, be that music, art or even writing, that is constructed with multiple directions of interpretations. How the piece is interpreted depends on the viewers perspective and their initiative to string elements together to create a whole piece. How someone sees and interprets a piece depends entirely on their subjective thinking through a certain perspective, thus creating this openness as one person can not possibly think the exact same way as another. Artists like to harness this multitude of interpretations as it adds an infinite amount of layers to an artwork making it reflect the dynamic and complex human personality. The open nature of art and creative work results in the work constantly developing and it encourages the viewer to think harder to unravel the messages hidden underneath the years of different interpretations. It pushes art further forward and so encourages innovation in the way artists think.

Overall I think the main theme of The Poetics of the Open Work by Umberto Eco is a sense of openness. What Eco means by this is that everyone has freewill and sometimes we make decisions without even realising,which is shown by the example he used about a music conductor subconsciously choosing how long to hold each particular note during a performance. Another example he used is that we also interpret things subconsciously, for example things such as weather and use of a specific colour in a book are usually seento symbolise a particular emotion even though the author may not have intended it to be seen in that way.

Openness
Symbolism
Subconscious
Freewill
Creativity
Subjective
Perception
Consumerism
Experience
Chance
Interaction
Performance

Consumerism
Symbolism
Culture
Historical
Political
Economic 
Interpretation
Subjective
Perception
Frames
Performer
Experience
Chants
Interaction 
Conductor
  • - 
  • In the poetics of the open work I feel that it is telling a designer throughout their creative process to never forget there are going to be problems or flaws that will happen and that you need to keep positive on the work you are creating. Work can be understand in more than one sense so if your wishing your work to symbolise one aspect, you need to work hard to make that thought stay in the consumers mind and not thinking of other roots to your process.

  • Interpretation
  • Interaction
  • Symbolism
  • Semiotics
  • Perception
  • Percieve
  • Consumerism
  • Experience
  • Chance

  • In the chapter, Umberto Eco raises questions and suggests answers that are intertwined in a debate on literature, art and general culture. The piece is based on the concept of ‘openness’; suggesting a decision was made to leave the arrangements of some elements of work to chance or public perception. It suggests that all forms of art are ‘open’, explored in contemporary literary theory, which is the multiplicity and plurality in art. Umberto Eco also explores the insistence on literary response as an interaction between reader and text.

  • How would you contextualise the open work to your practice? 

  • I would start to think about the whole idea of how he gives this idea of any work can be open to interoperation and how could I make my own work to give the same impression, as being one of those pieces that Eco is referring to, so that the audience can take what they want from it and its something to aspire to be able to do.

  • Key words

  • Interpretation 

  • Able to inform the audience 

  • Open 

  • impressionable 

  • Inspire others 

  • Chapter response: Eco's theory of the Open works describes when an author leaves some freedom for the performer to perform with, and this collaboration creates something that is not explicitly one thing, leaving it open to multiple meanings and interpretations. 
  • This is because everyone who witnesses this performance will have their own interpretation, as everyone will have different past experiences.
  • 'Works of Movement' involve incomplete works that require some level of 'completion by the audience or the perforer.
  • I also think that Eco was trying to say that no work is complete until it has been interpreted by a viewer, but at the same time someone's interpretation can change each time they look at the piece, and it is up to the viewer to find the most meaningful explanation of the work.

  • Thoughts on the Open Work:
  • -The link between author and the performer isn't as important
  • -Audience interpretation is key so the work needs to be open as possible
  • -Artistic Freedom is what creates this openess
  • -Viewer has the freedom to interpretate it how they want to

  • In what ways do you think that Open Works are poetic?
  • They are poetic as they allow the viewer to make their own interpretation from the works, somewhat similar to poems(?)

  • How would you contextualise the open work to your practice?
  • -By opening up work so that is can have more than one meaning depending on who looks at it
  • -By including some kind of audience participation if appropriate?
  • -Being open to other view points or interpretations
  • -How would the meaning or how people interpretate it change is there was a change in culutural view points?

  • Key Words:
  • -Openess
  • -meaning
  • -interpretation
  • -collaboration
  • -infinite interpretations
  • -freedom
  • -experience
  • -utilization
  • -Works of Movement
  • -Open Works
  • -Reception
  • -Cultural perceptions
  • -Subjectivity

  • The abstract is about how a performer and a conductor work together to get the best performance. This canthen be related to the art world because of comparisons about the performers use of initiative on stage, after recieving vague instructions. This can be related to design as designers recieve vague like briefs where they can use initiative to create new ideas. However, creation can be hard because there is restrictions in place by a clients needs and this is expressed throughout the abstract with the analogy of composers and performers. The relation grows stronger with an addition of mystery being solved, which I interpret that meaning a designer is a problem solver or in this case a mystery solver. This is by solving the issue given through a project and with viewers of the final outcome seeing it in their own interpretations or memories.

  • TID1423: Theory as Practise 

  • Umberto Eco - Text Task.

  • Umberto Eco’s The Poetics of the Open Work from 1962 takes a look at the relationship between the viewer and the artist. The text shares the ideas of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ work. The text shares various examples of work from poems, classical music and even road signs that convey the ideas. ‘Open’ being pieces that have indefinite amount of meanings and interpretations each changing with the viewers emotions, social aspects among other factors. ‘Closed’ being the idea that work can only be seen in one sense much like a road sign. Once a piece of work is seen differently or worked around it then ceases to be the work that had the original message.  Sharing this new relationship artists have with their audiences. 


Key words

Freedom
Time
culture
Perceptions
Trends
Social
Change
Open
Closed
Movement
Subject
Audience

Umberto Eco thoroughly reflects on how works of art are ‘open’ in terms of the responses that can be  interpreted and read differently by the audience. However, Eco looks more in depth at the different degrees of ‘openness’ whilst comparing different media. He analyses musical compositions and the choices performers make to establish their own improvised creation. He also compares literature comparing the allegorical interpretations from symbolism and ambiguities. Through these examples he argues the importance of preventing a single univocal meaning right from the outset of the creation process. Overall in the whole text, I felt Eco importantly emphasises that during the creative process of any art it is essential to consider and acknowledge that your media text will be read differently due to emotional responses, different cultures and personal experiences. 

Every piece of art can be viewed differently depending on the current emotion of theviewer. Although their past experiences influence “the message”. Art is a verylucid form viewed by everyone differently, but the artist puts his piece inframes limiting the ‘”openness” of their work to some extent.

During this seminar we were given the task to go home and read Umberto Eco's essay (Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Cambridge, Mass: Havard University Press.), The Open Work, and then return with a 125 word summary. Below is my summary:

            "The open work is an art that can be interpreted in different ways by each viewer, however the creator will have their own meaning. It allows the viewer to create their own possibilities, varying due to different cultural/social contexts and personal experiences. An open work is also about not putting a limit to the possibilities, allowing the viewers to add their own piece." 
   
We were then asked to think about the following question:

"How would you contextualize The Open Work to your practice?"

I think it is telling us to look at other fields including music, literature etc. And to think outside the box and keep an open mind to the possibilities of what we could create and how the meaning of our work could change culturally and through time.

Other keywords related to The Open Work piece:
- Limitless
- Free
- Perspectives
- Interpretive
- Movements & Trends

In The poetics of the Open Work, EcoUmberto defines that the open works is an art that can be interpreted in manydifferent ways by the viewer, depending on what the viewer wants to see it as. 
However, the Artist/Creator will alreadyhave their own idea or meaning to the piece of work that is being produced. 
The open work allows the viewer to createtheir own possibilities, varying by each cultural context and personalexperiences. 

-Movement/Changes in society
-no limit
-wide perspective